The vscode configuration example in the README.md does not work with my version of vscode. Since it's also not required, this change removes it so that it works in all versions of vscode.
Version:
```
Version: 1.99.1 (Universal)
Commit: 7c6fdfb0b8f2f675eb0b47f3d95eeca78962565b
Date: 2025-04-04T15:58:59.624Z (4 days ago)
Electron: 34.3.2
ElectronBuildId: 11161073
Chromium: 132.0.6834.210
Node.js: 20.18.3
V8: 13.2.152.41-electron.0
OS: Darwin x64 24.3.0
```
* Update README.md to explain Agent mode will start the server
* Update README.md
Co-authored-by: Sam Morrow <info@sam-morrow.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Sam Morrow <info@sam-morrow.com>
* Add add_pull_request_review_comment tool for PR review comments
Adds the ability to add review comments to pull requests with support for line, multi-line, and file-level comments, as well as replying to existing comments.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
* Add reply_to_pull_request_review_comment tool
Adds a new tool to reply to existing pull request review comments using the GitHub API's comment reply endpoint. This allows for threaded discussions on pull request reviews.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
* Update README with new PR review comment tools
* rebase
* use new getClient function inadd and reply pr review tools
* Unify PR review comment tools into a single consolidated tool
The separate AddPullRequestReviewComment and ReplyToPullRequestReviewComment tools have been merged into a single tool that handles both creating new comments and replying to existing ones. This approach simplifies the API and provides a more consistent interface for users.
- Made commit_id and path optional when using in_reply_to for replies
- Updated the tests to verify both comment and reply functionality
- Removed the separate ReplyToPullRequestReviewComment tool
- Fixed test expectations to match how errors are returned
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
* Update README to reflect the unified PR review comment tool
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Javier Uruen Val <juruen@github.com>
* Add ability to view branches for a repo #141
* fix: update ListBranches test to use InputSchema and correct translation helper
* fix: update ListBranches test to use InputSchema and correct translation helper
* fix: update ListBranches test to handle errors in tool result
* fix: replace deprecated github.String with github.Ptr
* docs: add list_branches tool documentation to README
Page size tool parameter names were changed to `perPage` within #90
while GitHub API uses `per_page` parameter name.
This change fixes overlooked inconsistencies.
Follow up on #90
Follow up on #129Fixes#136
Signed-off-by: Alexander Yastrebov <yastrebov.alex@gmail.com>
* Add line parameter support to create_pull_request_review tool
- Updated schema to make path and body the only required fields
- Added line parameter as alternative to position for inline comments
- Updated handler to accept either position or line based on GitHub API spec
- Added new test case that verifies line parameter works properly
- Updated error messages for better validation
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
* Expand PR review API with multi-line comment support
- Added new parameters: line, side, start_line, start_side
- Added proper validation for multi-line comment parameters
- Improved validation logic to handle parameter combinations
- Added test cases for regular and multi-line comments
- Updated schema documentation for better tool discoverability
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
* gofmt
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Javier Uruen Val <juruen@github.com>
* Add support for retrieving GitHub Issue Comments
Add new tool 'get_issue_comments' that allows fetching comments associated
with GitHub issues. This complements the existing issue retrieval functionality
and follows the same patterns as the pull request comments implementation.
The implementation includes:
- New getIssueComments function in pkg/github/issues.go
- Tool registration in server.go
- Comprehensive test coverage in issues_test.go
* Support pagination for get_issue_comments
---------
Co-authored-by: Javier Uruen Val <juruen@github.com>
William Martin