The SSO & Directory Sync settings page decided access by comparing the organization's plan code against the literal string `"enterprise"`. The webapp now reads a `hasSso` entitlement from plan limits. ## Changes - **`settings.sso` route** — `planAllowsSso` reads `limits.hasSso` rather than the plan code; the loader and the action gate on a shared `getSsoEntitlement` helper. - **`platform.v3.server`** — new `getSsoEntitlement(orgId)` returning `entitled | not_entitled | unknown`, behind a new SWR cache namespace (60s fresh / 120s stale, memory + Redis). This replaces an uncached billing round-trip that previously ran on every settings load, so the page gets cheaper than it was. - **`directorySyncEffects`** — the entitlement is now checked before applying membership effects, per organization and memoised across a batch. - **`@trigger.dev/platform` 1.2.0 → 1.3.0** — required, see below. ## Behaviour worth reviewing **Revocation now stops SCIM.** Previously the plan check existed only on the settings page, so an org that lost access kept receiving directory-sync pushes indefinitely; only the config UI froze. Provision *and* deprovision are gated, so a revoked entitlement can't remove members either. **An unreadable entitlement throws instead of skipping.** Effects are idempotent and the worker retries, so retrying is lossless where dropping would silently lose a directory change. It's raised at `warn` level so a transient billing blip doesn't page anyone. **The login path is deliberately untouched.** A hard entitlement check there turns a billing outage into a login outage. Consequence: an org that loses the entitlement keeps its existing SSO logins working until the connection is removed. Gating sign-in is a separate decision. **Self-hosted is unaffected.** With no billing service configured the helper returns `entitled`, leaving plugin presence and the kill switch as the only gates — a self-hoster who installed the plugin isn't locked out of it. ## The dependency bump is load-bearing The `Limits` schema is a plain `z.object`, so it *strips* unknown keys. On 1.2.0 the `hasSso` field was silently discarded during parsing and read as `undefined` no matter what billing sent — a structural accessor would not have helped. Verified against both builds: ``` 1.2.0 → parsed: true | hasSso survives: false 1.3.0 → parsed: true | hasSso survives: true ``` This PR therefore cannot merge before 1.3.0 is published, which it now is. ## Testing `apps/webapp/test/directorySyncEffects.server.test.ts` — 7 tests over the gate: applies when entitled, skips provision and deprovision when not, throws a warn-level retryable error when unreadable, resolves once per org across a batch, and gates per org so one unentitled org doesn't block another. `pnpm run typecheck --filter webapp` passes (18/18), oxfmt and oxlint clean.
Server Changes
This directory tracks changes to server-only components (webapp, supervisor, etc.) that are not captured by changesets. Changesets only track published npm packages — server changes would otherwise go undocumented.
When to add a file
Server-only PRs: If your PR only changes apps/webapp/, apps/supervisor/, or other server components (and does NOT change anything in packages/), add a .server-changes/ file.
Mixed PRs (both packages and server): Just add a changeset as usual. No .server-changes/ file needed — the changeset covers it.
Package-only PRs: Just add a changeset as usual.
File format
Create a markdown file with a descriptive name:
.server-changes/fix-batch-queue-stalls.md
With this format:
---
area: webapp
type: fix
---
Speed up batch queue processing by removing stalls and fixing retry race
Fields
- area (required):
webapp|supervisor - type (required):
feature|fix|improvement|breaking
Description
The body text (below the frontmatter) is a one-line description of the change. Keep it concise — it will appear in release notes.
Writing guidance
These entries are public-facing - they ship verbatim in user-visible release notes. A few rules to keep them clean:
- Write for the user, not the reviewer. Lead with what the user notices or has to do. If a reader who doesn't know the codebase can't tell what changed for them, rewrite it.
- One sentence is usually enough. The body is the bullet in the changelog. If you need a paragraph, you're probably describing the implementation rather than the change.
- Describe behavior, not implementation. Skip internal scopes, middleware names, library specifics, framework internals. Users care about what's different for them, not how it's wired.
- Never name internal tools or infra. Observability stacks, internal services, infra components, monitoring backends, CI surfaces, AWS specifics - none of these belong in user-facing notes.
Before / after:
- ❌ "The image verification step now parses the manifest's layer media types and returns a new result the finalizer rejects." (describes the wiring; a user can't act on it)
- ✅ "Deploying with an outdated CLI could produce an image that fails to start on every run. These deploys are now stopped before going live, with a message asking you to upgrade the CLI and re-deploy." (what the user sees and does)
Lifecycle
- Engineer adds a
.server-changes/file in their PR - Files accumulate on
mainas PRs merge - The changeset release PR includes these in its summary
- After the release merges, CI cleans up the consumed files
Examples
New feature:
---
area: webapp
type: feature
---
TRQL query language and the Query page
Bug fix:
---
area: webapp
type: fix
---
Fix schedule limit counting for orgs with custom limits
Improvement:
---
area: webapp
type: improvement
---
Use the replica for API auth queries to reduce primary load