Files
triggerdotdev--trigger.dev/.server-changes
Eric Allam 5ba8557a51 chore(webapp,core): remove the end-of-life v3 (engine V1) execution stack (#4236)
## Summary

v3 (the engine that ran the SDK v3 era, internally
`RunEngineVersion.V1`) is end-of-life. Following the removal of the v3
execution apps
([#4194](https://github.com/triggerdotdev/trigger.dev/pull/4194)) and
the legacy dev websocket
([#4198](https://github.com/triggerdotdev/trigger.dev/pull/4198)), this
removes the remaining v3 execution stack from the server.

Clients still on v3 (an old SDK or CLI that has not upgraded) keep
getting a clear "upgrade to v4" response. Triggers, batch triggers,
reschedules, and deploys that resolve to v3 are rejected with a graceful
4xx pointing at the migration guide, never a 5xx, so a stale client
cannot affect server health. Self-hosted instances still running v3
should stay on the 4.5.x release line until they migrate.

## What is removed

- The MarQS queue and its shared/dev queue consumers.
- The v3 socket.io namespaces (coordinator, provider, shared-queue) and
the v3 run lifecycle services (attempt, checkpoint, and batch-resume).
- The graphile-worker background job system; all live jobs already run
on `@trigger.dev/redis-worker`.
- The `DEPRECATE_V3_ENABLED` flag: v3 is now rejected unconditionally,
so the flag is gone.
- Unused v3 exports from `@trigger.dev/core` (the `v3/zodNamespace`
subpath and the legacy socket message catalogs) and the now-dead MarQS
environment variables.

## What stays

The v4 engine is untouched. The graceful v3 rejection boundary stays,
`determineEngineVersion` still detects a v3 project so it can reject it,
and the batch service plus batch-completion worker stay for current
clients. Live queue concurrency limits and metrics now read from the v4
run engine instead of MarQS, and a brand-new dev environment now
defaults to v4.



## Dependency cleanup

Removes webapp dependencies left unused by this change: `seedrandom` and
`semver` (only the removed v3 code used them) plus a set that was
already dead, their orphaned `@types` packages, and two dead files. Adds
a `knip:deps` script and a `knip.json` config so unused dependencies can
be found the same way going forward.
2026-07-13 11:32:06 +01:00
..

Server Changes

This directory tracks changes to server-only components (webapp, supervisor, etc.) that are not captured by changesets. Changesets only track published npm packages — server changes would otherwise go undocumented.

When to add a file

Server-only PRs: If your PR only changes apps/webapp/, apps/supervisor/, or other server components (and does NOT change anything in packages/), add a .server-changes/ file.

Mixed PRs (both packages and server): Just add a changeset as usual. No .server-changes/ file needed — the changeset covers it.

Package-only PRs: Just add a changeset as usual.

File format

Create a markdown file with a descriptive name:

.server-changes/fix-batch-queue-stalls.md

With this format:

---
area: webapp
type: fix
---

Speed up batch queue processing by removing stalls and fixing retry race

Fields

  • area (required): webapp | supervisor
  • type (required): feature | fix | improvement | breaking

Description

The body text (below the frontmatter) is a one-line description of the change. Keep it concise — it will appear in release notes.

Writing guidance

These entries are public-facing - they ship verbatim in user-visible release notes. A few rules to keep them clean:

  • Write for the user, not the reviewer. Lead with what the user notices or has to do. If a reader who doesn't know the codebase can't tell what changed for them, rewrite it.
  • One sentence is usually enough. The body is the bullet in the changelog. If you need a paragraph, you're probably describing the implementation rather than the change.
  • Describe behavior, not implementation. Skip internal scopes, middleware names, library specifics, framework internals. Users care about what's different for them, not how it's wired.
  • Never name internal tools or infra. Observability stacks, internal services, infra components, monitoring backends, CI surfaces, AWS specifics - none of these belong in user-facing notes.

Before / after:

  • "The image verification step now parses the manifest's layer media types and returns a new result the finalizer rejects." (describes the wiring; a user can't act on it)
  • "Deploying with an outdated CLI could produce an image that fails to start on every run. These deploys are now stopped before going live, with a message asking you to upgrade the CLI and re-deploy." (what the user sees and does)

Lifecycle

  1. Engineer adds a .server-changes/ file in their PR
  2. Files accumulate on main as PRs merge
  3. The changeset release PR includes these in its summary
  4. After the release merges, CI cleans up the consumed files

Examples

New feature:

---
area: webapp
type: feature
---

TRQL query language and the Query page

Bug fix:

---
area: webapp
type: fix
---

Fix schedule limit counting for orgs with custom limits

Improvement:

---
area: webapp
type: improvement
---

Use the replica for API auth queries to reduce primary load