## Summary
Adds `.claude/REVIEW.md` — a repo-specific source of truth for what AI /
agent code reviewers should treat as critical in this codebase
(rolling-deploy safety, hot-table indexes, recovery-path queries,
testcontainers usage, etc.). Pairs with a Claude-based PR audit that
flags drift between REVIEW.md and the code as it evolves.
## How the audit works
Mirrors the existing `.github/workflows/claude-md-audit.yml` pattern. On
non-draft, non-fork PRs that touch code, `anthropics/claude-code-action`
reads REVIEW.md, samples the PR diff, and posts a sticky comment with up
to 3 of:
- `[stale]` — rule cites a path / function / table that's been removed
or renamed
- `[contradiction]` — code in the PR violates a current rule
- `[missing]` — PR introduces a new pattern future reviewers should know
about
- `[obsolete]` — rule asserts a constraint the repo has moved past
If nothing's off, posts `✅ REVIEW.md looks current for this PR.`
## Test plan
- [ ] Convert this PR to ready-for-review, confirm the audit runs and
posts a sticky comment
- [ ] Verify the audit doesn't run on fork PRs (gated by
`head.repo.full_name == github.repository`)
- [ ] Verify suggestions are actionable on at least one follow-up PR
Eric Allam
3cbe9f2307