发布

  • v1337 82fecbb5ad

    docs(adr-125): resolve topology + identity-risk questions per review

    frostbyte_neo 发布于 2026-05-25 20:02:51 +00:00

    Two open questions from §5 promoted to decisions in §2:

    §2.1.c — Topology: one HAP bridge, N child accessories. Single pairing
    flow; child accessories assignable to rooms in the Apple Home
    app; matches every reference HomeKit bridge UX (Hue, Eve, ...).
    The N-independent-accessories alternative was rejected for the
    room-multiplication mess it creates after the second pairing.

    §2.1.d — Identity-risk mapping is semantic, not probabilistic. The
    raw identity_risk_score and Soul-Signature match probability
    NEVER cross the HAP boundary. Instead we expose three thresholded
    semantic events: Unknown Presence, Unexpected Occupancy,
    Unrecognized Activity Pattern. Naming is the contract — these
    read as ambient awareness, not threat detection, so RuView does
    not become "RF surveillance with an Apple skin." This is the
    decision that determines whether the HomeKit story ages well.

    §5 trimmed to two genuinely-open items: setup-code derivation
    (deterministic vs random) and ESP32-direct HAP advertisement.

    Co-Authored-By: claude-flow ruv@ruv.net

    下载附件