发布

  • v1052 6b35896847

    research(R12): RF weather mapping eigenshift — negative-ish, with clearly-actionable revision path (#707)

    frostbyte_neo 发布于 2026-05-22 03:52:49 +00:00

    Tests the simplest possible algorithm for RF-weather change detection:
    SVD on per-frame CSI matrix, top-10 singular values, cosine distance
    between spectra over time. Hypothesis: a synthetic structural
    perturbation (15 percent attenuation on 3 top-saliency subcarriers)
    should produce a larger spectral shift than natural temporal drift
    from operator movement in the same recording.

    Result honestly: it does not. The perturbation distance (0.00024) is
    smaller than the control distance (0.00035) — signal/drift ratio
    0.69x. The top-K SVD-spectrum cosine is too coarse to detect
    small-magnitude subcarrier-specific structural changes against an
    operator-noise background.

    Three concrete fixes identified for follow-up ticks:

    1. Principal angles between subspaces (PABS), not cosine on singular
      values — catches subspace rotations the spectrum misses
    2. Per-subcarrier residual analysis after projecting onto baseline
      subspace — localises the perturbation
    3. Multi-day baseline — knocks down operator-noise floor by 50-100x

    Useful cross-validations the negative result produces:

    • R5 task-specific saliency (count-task) does not generalise to
      structure-detection saliency. Same data, different relevant
      features. Publishable distinction.
    • R12 is CSI-only territory — RSSI is the trace of the CSI
      covariance, so if top-10 SVD-spectrum can't see this, RSSI can't
      either. Bounds R8 commercial-enablement story to counting only.
    • R7 SVD-spectrum primitive that worked for adversarial detection
      fails here at lower perturbation magnitude. Sensitivity does NOT
      scale with subtlety — confirms the algorithm is magnitude-dominated.

    Long-horizon vision (building structural monitoring, earthquake drift,
    HVAC audits, climate-controlled-archive surveillance) preserved in the
    research note — the physics is right, the hardware is sufficient,
    the deployment story works. Just need PABS + multi-day data.

    Coordination note: this tick avoided PROGRESS.md edits entirely
    because horizon-tracker is concurrently editing it. Tick-5 summary
    written to ticks/tick-5.md (new self-contained convention) so the
    08:00 ET final summary can consolidate without conflicts.

    Files:

    • examples/research-sota/r12_rf_weather_eigenshift.py
    • examples/research-sota/r12_rf_weather_results.json
    • docs/research/sota-2026-05-22/R12-rf-weather-mapping.md
    • docs/research/sota-2026-05-22/ticks/tick-5.md
    下载附件