Reverting 'Merge pull request #2483 python-history-provider'
We didn't experience the expected performance improvements. Locally under unit test there was aboout an order of magnitude throughput increase, but when run against the history benchmark, this new approach was 60% slower. We're reverting this for now to perform further analysis and better understand the performance profiling of the python history stack.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -13,12 +13,13 @@
|
||||
|
||||
from clr import AddReference
|
||||
AddReference("System")
|
||||
AddReference("QuantConnect.Algorithm")
|
||||
AddReference("QuantConnect.Common")
|
||||
|
||||
from System import *
|
||||
from QuantConnect import *
|
||||
from QuantConnect.Algorithm import *
|
||||
from QuantConnect.Data.Custom.Tiingo import *
|
||||
from QCAlgorithm import QCAlgorithm
|
||||
|
||||
### <summary>
|
||||
### This example algorithm shows how to import and use Tiingo daily prices data.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user