The <ignores> entry was added on the reasoning that it was redundant while the
pin stood but would make a dropped pin fail loudly. That reasoning was backwards,
and measuring it showed the opposite:
- ignore removed, pin in place -> rule passes (the entry was doing nothing)
- ignore removed, pin removed -> rule FAILS, naming wcag-algorithms 1.31.44
resolved from the range via wcag-validation
- ignore present, pin removed -> rule passes, drift is silent
So the ignore only suppressed the one failure worth having. Removed, along with
the comment that argued for it. Caught in review of #697.
Verified: 851 tests pass, BanDynamicVersions passes on all three modules.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Bundo Lee
967574ff3d