* feat: add GitHub Actions tools for workflow management
- Introduced new tools for managing GitHub Actions workflows, including listing workflows, running workflows, canceling workflow runs, and retrieving workflow run logs.
- Updated README.md to include new `actions` toolset and detailed descriptions of the new tools.
- Added comprehensive tests for the new functionality to ensure reliability and correctness.
* feat: enhance GitHub Actions toolset with additional workflow management capabilities
- Added new tools for managing GitHub Actions, including listing workflows, retrieving workflow run logs, and managing workflow runs.
- Integrated the new `actions` toolset into the default toolset group for improved accessibility.
* feat: enhance GetJobLogs functionality for improved job log retrieval
- Added new tests for GetJobLogs, including scenarios for retrieving logs for both single jobs and failed jobs.
- Updated GetJobLogs tool description to clarify its capabilities for fetching logs efficiently.
- Implemented error handling for missing required parameters and optimized responses for failed job logs.
- Introduced functionality to return actual log content instead of just URLs when requested.
* feat: enhance GetJobLogs functionality for improved job log retrieval
- Added new tests for GetJobLogs, including scenarios for retrieving logs for both single jobs and failed jobs.
- Updated GetJobLogs tool description to clarify its capabilities for fetching logs efficiently.
- Implemented error handling for missing required parameters and optimized responses for failed job logs.
- Introduced functionality to return actual log content instead of just URLs when requested.
* refactor: standardize parameter handling and read-only hints in GitHub Actions tools
- Replaced instances of `requiredParam` with `RequiredParam` for consistency across all tools.
- Updated `toBoolPtr` to `ToBoolPtr` in tool annotations to maintain uniformity in boolean pointer handling.
- Ensured all tools in the GitHub Actions suite adhere to the new naming conventions for improved readability and maintainability.
* docs: add missing actions toolset to Available Toolsets table
* feat: enhance GitHub Actions tool descriptions with enumerated options
- Updated descriptions for workflow run status and job filters to include enumerated options for clarity.
- Improved documentation for better usability and understanding of available parameters.
* feat: expand event type options in GitHub Actions tool descriptions
- Enhanced the event parameter description in the ListWorkflowRuns function to include a comprehensive list of supported event types.
- Improved clarity and usability for users by providing enumerated options for event types in the documentation.
* feat: add support for running workflows by ID and filename in GitHub Actions tools
- Introduced a new tool, RunWorkflowByFileName, to allow users to run workflows using the workflow filename.
- Updated the existing RunWorkflow tool to accept a numeric workflow ID instead of a filename.
- Enhanced tests to cover scenarios for both running workflows by ID and filename, including error handling for missing parameters.
- Improved tool descriptions for clarity and usability.
* feat: standardize repository parameter descriptions in GitHub Actions tools
- Introduced constants for repository owner and name descriptions to enhance consistency across multiple tools.
- Updated all relevant tools to use the new constants for improved clarity and maintainability in parameter descriptions.
* feat: enhance GitHub Actions tools with user-friendly titles
- Added user-friendly titles to tool annotations for various GitHub Actions tools, improving clarity and usability for end-users.
- Updated descriptions for tools including ListWorkflows, ListWorkflowRuns, RunWorkflow, and others to include new titles for better identification and understanding of their functionalities.
* feat: unify workflow execution in GitHub Actions tools
- Refactored the RunWorkflow tool to accept both numeric workflow IDs and filenames, enhancing flexibility for users.
- Updated the corresponding tests to reflect changes in parameter handling and added assertions for workflow type in responses.
- Removed the separate RunWorkflowByFileName tool to streamline functionality and improve code maintainability.
* fix: linting issues
* add context toolset and adjust readme
* move resources to a toolset
* add resource registration as a toolset concern
* add a note about broadening of toolsets
* Apply suggestion from @SamMorrowDrums
The vscode configuration example in the README.md does not work with my version of vscode. Since it's also not required, this change removes it so that it works in all versions of vscode.
Version:
```
Version: 1.99.1 (Universal)
Commit: 7c6fdfb0b8f2f675eb0b47f3d95eeca78962565b
Date: 2025-04-04T15:58:59.624Z (4 days ago)
Electron: 34.3.2
ElectronBuildId: 11161073
Chromium: 132.0.6834.210
Node.js: 20.18.3
V8: 13.2.152.41-electron.0
OS: Darwin x64 24.3.0
```
* Update README.md to explain Agent mode will start the server
* Update README.md
Co-authored-by: Sam Morrow <info@sam-morrow.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Sam Morrow <info@sam-morrow.com>
* Add add_pull_request_review_comment tool for PR review comments
Adds the ability to add review comments to pull requests with support for line, multi-line, and file-level comments, as well as replying to existing comments.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
* Add reply_to_pull_request_review_comment tool
Adds a new tool to reply to existing pull request review comments using the GitHub API's comment reply endpoint. This allows for threaded discussions on pull request reviews.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
* Update README with new PR review comment tools
* rebase
* use new getClient function inadd and reply pr review tools
* Unify PR review comment tools into a single consolidated tool
The separate AddPullRequestReviewComment and ReplyToPullRequestReviewComment tools have been merged into a single tool that handles both creating new comments and replying to existing ones. This approach simplifies the API and provides a more consistent interface for users.
- Made commit_id and path optional when using in_reply_to for replies
- Updated the tests to verify both comment and reply functionality
- Removed the separate ReplyToPullRequestReviewComment tool
- Fixed test expectations to match how errors are returned
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
* Update README to reflect the unified PR review comment tool
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Javier Uruen Val <juruen@github.com>
* Add ability to view branches for a repo #141
* fix: update ListBranches test to use InputSchema and correct translation helper
* fix: update ListBranches test to use InputSchema and correct translation helper
* fix: update ListBranches test to handle errors in tool result
* fix: replace deprecated github.String with github.Ptr
* docs: add list_branches tool documentation to README
Lulu